CONFLICT & Gurdjieff's Self-Remembering
Conflict is normally perceived as a problem due to
difference of opinions or views.
Conflicts can be at global, national, institutional or
individual’s level.
But the common factor is disagreement over ideas, opinions
etc.
Conflict resolution at global or institutional level is
elaborate, complex and will persist
as long as conflict at individual level exists.
So, what is important is conflict that exists in an
individual because it is the individuals
who collectively make the bigger entities.
Disagreement is inevitable.
It is obvious; no one can be right about everything every
time.
But, why disagreement should create conflict.
Let us bring it down to simple form to understand its
structure.
There are two kinds of opinions one come across- Objective
and Subjective.
Regarding external entities (Car, House, Business, Decease
etc…), one can have
Objective opinion based on one’s knowledge.
Regarding internal psychological entities (People, Religion,
Culture etc…), one can have
Subjective opinion based on One’s Ego or the ‘Me’.
In other words
One can have objective opinion in the physical plane and Subjective
opinion in the Psychological plane.
Say for instance,
If one has a objective technical opinion about a Car, he is
ready to change or give up the
opinion, if an expert in the field says it is not correct.
So, there is no conflict or antagonism in the mind over
disagreement.
(Even here, if one has
a ‘Self-Image’ (Psychological) that he is ‘Knowledgeable’, he may
accept the expert
opinion, but feel down as if his ‘Ignorance’ is exposed and ‘Reputation’
is damaged.)
But generally one knows that his knowledge is limited and
ready to change his Objective
opinion in the physical plane.
Now,
In the psychological plane, one’s opinion is subjective.
Opinion is based on the Ego or ‘Me’, rather created by it.
As we know,
The content of the ‘Me’ is acquired or learned from the
society, and it includes everything
from background, brought up, culture, values, prejudices,
past experiences etc.
All subjective opinions are dependent on this ‘Me’.
The problem is,
Though the content of the ‘Me’ or ‘Ego-Self’ is psychological
‘Knowledge’,
It manifests itself as a persona in our day to day engagements.
(We have already seen
this aspect in the earlier posts).
So,
If some one disagrees with a subjective opinion, it will be
perceived as a personal challenge
and the other will be looked upon as an
antagonist.
‘Disagreement’ is not over the Opinion but with the ‘Me’ or
‘Ego’ – The Persona.
This false perception makes the ‘Disagreement’ into conflict
leading to antagonism.
Say for instance,
If some one disagrees with one’s religious belief
This is perceived as a challenge to the person him self.
Religious belief is not looked upon as ‘knowledge’ but as
identity of the Person.
So, the disagreement is not about an ‘opinion’ but the about
the ‘identity’.
This transforms the disagreement into a conflict and to
antagonism between individuals.
(This antagonism
collectively leads to enmity between population groups.
The chaos we witness
today has its origin here and one can also logically see that the
solution do not exist
in the plane of ‘Belief’. )
How to deal with
the situation (at individual level)
Now,
If one remember one self (Self-Remembering) during the episode
of ‘disagreement’,
That is if one stays with the situation, without going
beyond the situation
–
To the past for justification, to the future to end the
conflict.
Initially the mind may stagger urging one to react and end
the conflict by going beyond the present.
But, if one persists, the staggering mind will become quite
and one can see the false
Personality and its motives with its roots in the ‘Belief’.
(It is false
personality because a ‘Belief’ is an idea not actual or realized truth)
And also see the cause behind the attitude of antagonism.
That is,
If ‘Disagreement’ is acknowledged, the very existence of
this false personality is at stake.
So it tries to defend itself by taking a hostile stance.
The moment one become conscious of this process, the mind stops
the mechanical impulsive reaction
and become stable and balanced.
One may not give up his belief, but hostility ceases.
Because, one can actually see that the ‘Self’ is not at
stake over the issue.
By becoming conscious through Self-remembering, one is not
immediately eliminating the identity,
but one
gains control and depth in awareness.
This in turn reduces mechanical reaction and increases
conscious response.
In general,
Not only beliefs but also images such as ‘Wife’ or ‘Husband’
can give rise to conflict,
If a ‘Woman’ or ‘Man’ do not fit into the ‘Image’ – which is
a social construct.
If one becomes conscious of Images or Identities and their potential
for mischief, one can
handle them rationally, without bias and avoid escalating a
‘disagreement’ in to a ‘Conflict’.
Now the larger picture,
If this is applied to all identities and images of one-self
and others,
One can approach life not as a ‘conflict’ but as a journey
(Pleasant or Otherwise)
towards the True-Self.